The Legal Conception of Misleading Product Labelling and its Operationalization. In: Misleading Marketing Communication: Assessing the Impact of Potentially Deceptive Food Labelling on Consumer Behaviour. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 11-24.
Measuring Misleadingness: The Preference-Conscious Choice Modelled and Observed. In: Misleading Marketing Communication: Assessing the Impact of Potentially Deceptive Food Labelling on Consumer Behaviour. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 25 -32.
Study 1: Low-Fat Claims on Real-Market Products. In: Misleading Marketing Communication: Assessing the Impact of Potentially Deceptive Food Labelling on Consumer Behaviour. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 35-52.
Study 2: Low-fat Claims on Fictitious Products. In: Misleading Marketing Communication: Assessing the Impact of Potentially Deceptive Food Labelling on Consumer Behaviour. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 53 -62.
Study 3: What’s Behind the Keyhole. In: Misleading Marketing Communication: Assessing the Impact of Potentially Deceptive Food Labelling on Consumer Behaviour. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 63 -78.
Study 4: “Local” by Facts or by Atmosphere? In: Misleading Marketing Communication: Assessing the Impact of Potentially Deceptive Food Labelling on Consumer Behaviour. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 79 -98.
Why Do Consumers Get it Wrong? In: Misleading Marketing Communication: Assessing the Impact of Potentially Deceptive Food Labelling on Consumer Behaviour. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 101 -120.
Implications for Fair Labelling Practices: How to Get it Right? In: Misleading Marketing Communication: Assessing the Impact of Potentially Deceptive Food Labelling on Consumer Behaviour. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 121 -131.